US$79 remote; on-site audit coordination US$29 plus third-party costs. 3-5 working days for remote review.
Quick Facts
Timeline
3-5 working days for remote review
Price
US$79 remote; on-site audit coordination US$29 plus third-party costs
First enquiry needs
10 core fields
Deliverables
7 written outputs
The Problem This Service Solves
Factory Capability Review solves the point where a supplier claims production capacity but the buyer needs a practical remote review before placing an order. A buyer may have messages, screenshots, supplier claims or draft files, but still lack a usable decision record. This service converts those fragments into a scoped factory capability review file so the next approval is based on written facts rather than chat history.
It is also useful when the buyer cannot compare answers because each supplier uses a different format. Qinggate structures the information around outsourced process exposure, capacity credibility, equipment fit and quality-control readiness, records missing details and keeps third-party responsibilities separate from Qinggate's coordination role.
Who This Service Is For
Buyers who need a remote capability review before approving a supplier for production.
Importers who want written confirmation before paying, sampling, producing or shipping.
Teams that need a China-side contact to organise supplier replies into a decision-ready format.
Companies that want a bounded task with a clear price, timeline and deliverable before committing to wider support.
When This Service Is Not the Right Fit
Projects that require legal advice, litigation, tax advice or customs rulings.
Buyers who expect a supplier, factory, logistics provider or inspection company to be controlled by Qinggate.
Requests that depend on promises of lowest price, recovery or supplier performance.
What We Need From You
First enquiry fields
Product or service needed
Product link or reference description
Expected quantity
Destination market
Customisation required
Target timing
Product specification and target quality level
Planned order quantity and delivery deadline
Factory profile, equipment list and capacity statements
Quality certificates and similar product references
Formal Project Materials
Requested after the initial review when relevant
Product specification and target quality level
Planned order quantity and delivery deadline
Factory profile, equipment list and capacity statements
Quality certificates and similar product references
Supplier photos or videos with date context if available
Known outsourced processes or subcontracting concerns
Supplier contact details and role of each contact
Current quotation, PI, PO or project file if available
Commercial decisions that already have written approval
Constraints that should pause the work before extra cost is created
What We Do
Request current production-area, equipment and quality-control evidence
Check whether main processes match the target product and volume
Identify possible outsourced steps and missing process evidence
Review capacity statements against equipment and production-line signals
Record quality-control roles, inspection records and similar product history
Prepare capability notes and gaps that should be confirmed before order approval
Project Steps
01
1. Request current production-area, equipment
Request current production-area, equipment and quality-control evidence. The working record names the information source, the open question and the next client confirmation needed before the project moves forward.
Client confirms: Confirm whether the factory capability review record matches the intended buying decision.
Output: Factory Capability Review progress note 1
02
2. Check whether main processes
Check whether main processes match the target product and volume. The working record names the information source, the open question and the next client confirmation needed before the project moves forward.
Client confirms: Confirm whether the factory capability review record matches the intended buying decision.
Output: Factory Capability Review progress note 2
03
3. Identify possible outsourced steps
Identify possible outsourced steps and missing process evidence. The working record names the information source, the open question and the next client confirmation needed before the project moves forward.
Client confirms: Confirm whether the factory capability review record matches the intended buying decision.
Output: Factory Capability Review progress note 3
04
4. Review capacity statements against
Review capacity statements against equipment and production-line signals. The working record names the information source, the open question and the next client confirmation needed before the project moves forward.
Client confirms: Confirm whether the factory capability review record matches the intended buying decision.
Output: Factory Capability Review progress note 4
05
5. Record quality-control roles, inspection
Record quality-control roles, inspection records and similar product history. The working record names the information source, the open question and the next client confirmation needed before the project moves forward.
Client confirms: Confirm whether the factory capability review record matches the intended buying decision.
Output: Factory Capability Review progress note 5
06
6. Prepare capability notes and
Prepare capability notes and gaps that should be confirmed before order approval. The working record names the information source, the open question and the next client confirmation needed before the project moves forward.
Client confirms: Confirm whether the factory capability review record matches the intended buying decision.
Output: Factory Capability Review progress note 6
Client Approval Points
Client approves the factory capability review scope before paid work starts.
Client confirms any supplier-facing message before it is sent when it changes commercial position.
Client approves final recommendations, unresolved risks and any next-step service conversion.
Deliverables
Factory Capability Review
Process and Equipment Checklist
Outsourced Process List
Capacity Credibility Notes
Quality-control Gaps
Open Issue List
Recommended Next Step
Timeline
3-5 working days for remote review
Required documents or client approvals are missing.
A supplier does not reply, refuses to provide basic information or changes the commercial terms being reviewed.
A third-party quote, inspection booking, test requirement or logistics restriction requires client confirmation before further work.
Pricing
US$79 remote; on-site audit coordination US$29 plus third-party costs
Number of suppliers, SKUs, files or documents involved in the factory capability review scope.
Whether the product is standard, technical, regulated, customised or spread across many variants.
How complete the buyer's starting information is when the task begins.
Whether third-party providers must be compared, booked or briefed separately.
Third-party Costs
On-site audit providers, travel, testing and paid verification reports are third-party costs.
Product cost, sample charges, tooling, testing, inspection, pickup, storage, freight, insurance, duties and destination fees stay outside Qinggate service fees unless a written proposal says otherwise.
What Is Not Included
Formal on-site audit
Laboratory testing
Capacity truthfulness guarantee
Travel or inspection provider costs
Legal, tax, customs or regulatory opinions.
Guarantee of supplier truthfulness, supplier performance, production timing or shipment outcome.
Any unapproved third-party payment or cost paid on the client's behalf.
When the Scope May Change
The product, supplier list, SKU count, destination market or inspection scope changes after work starts.
New documents reveal a different legal entity, payment account, product specification or logistics constraint.
The client asks Qinggate to add negotiation, sample, production, inspection, logistics or rescue work outside the original task.
When the Project May Pause
Required documents or client approvals are missing.
A supplier does not reply, refuses to provide basic information or changes the commercial terms being reviewed.
A third-party quote, inspection booking, test requirement or logistics restriction requires client confirmation before further work.
Risks and Limitations
This service reduces confusion around outsourced process exposure, capacity credibility, equipment fit and quality-control readiness, but it cannot remove every commercial or operational risk.
Public records, supplier files and third-party reports can be incomplete, outdated or inconsistent.
Final buying, payment, production and shipment decisions remain with the client unless a later written agreement states otherwise.
Related Services
US$39/basic, US$69/enhanced per supplier
Supplier Verification & Payment Risk
Review supplier identity and payment documents before deposits or balance payments are approved.
You receive the written deliverables listed on this page, focused on factory capability review and the decision points needed for this specific service.
Can this service guarantee the supplier will perform?
No. The service improves the quality of information and coordination, but supplier performance, third-party findings and shipment outcomes cannot be guaranteed.
Can I start with this service before a full order?
Yes. The service is designed as a focused first step. If the project expands, the completed work can inform a later written proposal.
What happens if my documents are incomplete?
Qinggate records the missing items, explains why they matter and pauses supplier-facing or cost-generating actions until the necessary confirmation is available.
Are third-party fees included in the service price?
No. On-site audit providers, travel, testing and paid verification reports are third-party costs. Any external cost must be confirmed separately before it is created.
Next step
Ready to discuss Factory Capability Review?
Share the product, supplier status, quantity, destination market and timing. We will identify the next practical step and reply from an official @qinggate.com address.
